Zelda Wii U-What We Want to See

Nintendo has been keeping the Zelda Wii u’s game footage away from us for a while. it was announced last year at E3 2014 and was supposed to be release this year, but was delayed to 2016 (Which is the 30th anniversary of the legend of zelda franchise by the way…) Anyhow, whatever and whenever nintendo decides to show us the new footage (which Reggie Fils-aime confirmed that they had ready at E3, but nintendo decided not to) here are some things that we would like to see in the next Zelda for Wii U (and possibly NX????)


#1 More Towns/Villages


With the amazingly large map shown above, you’re gonna have to fill the vast landscapes with lots of farming villages, towns, and fishing villages, among many other things. Namely, Hyrule Castle Town and Kokiriko Village. The NPC’s should have higher AI (Artificial Intelligence, I.E. if link draws his sword, the villagers Should run in fear) and the towns should be large, but not too large so that you can’t get into many of the buildings. It would also be nice if link could ride Epona through the city. Also, The towns should have minigames, a bazaar/ marketplace, and many more.

#2 More Types of Transport


Even though we know link can transport with ease on Epona, I would kinda want other ways of transport that would make the game more interesting. It was also confirmed that link can use the sailcloth in this game too. Could this mean that this game is a direct sequel to skyward sword???? and if so, could that mean we can also get around on the loftwings, by flying in the sky and go to other places on the map? (maybe like a funner warp system, like soaring on latios/latias in Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire.) The chances of that are kinda low, but another form of transport could be sailing, like in The Wind Waker. their does seem to be an ocean on the east side of the world map too, with light blue and dark blue colored water. the light blue water most likely represents water you can swim/dive in, while the dark water could be water you must sail on. canoeing through the inland lakes and rivers would be nice too, as well as fishing.

#3 Multiplayer

female link Zelda Wii U

This game is assumed to be non-linear, (like the original Legend Of Zelda) meaning you can go anywhere from the beginning and beat each dungeon in any order. So, with that in mind, couldn’t a second character (maybe female link as shown above?) be running around the world map at the same time? I mean, with 2 players, one on the TV and the other on the gamepad (like hyrule warriors) Doesn’t seem so hard. And, Link is also seen swinging his sword with his right hand, but Link is normally left handed, except for games that involve motion control (Twilight princess-Wii and Skyward Sword), which would also possibly hint to motion controls for the 2nd player. Link is also seen holding his sword in his right hand, on a cliff, in the original Legend of Zelda game’s (which was non-linear by the way) Concept art. Link is also seen on a cliff in the Demo with Eiji Aonuma (D, take a look

original concept art

Zelda Wii U-Link on a cliff
cliff in gameplay demo

Anyway, back to multiplayer, another cool idea might be that one player could play as Epona, and the other as Link,
Allowing it to be easier for Link to shoot enemies on horseback. Even though this is an unlikely concept I would still like multiplayer to be a somewhat presence in The Legend of Zelda Wii-U.

Ant-Man Review

Well, well, well, Ant-Man. Where do we begin? This is by far my personal favorite Marvel movie, and, Ant-Man is now my favorite marvel super hero (*cough* Get dat Ant-Man inter-console game ready Marvel *cough* *cough*). But, enough about me, let’s get down to the main review

If you are not a marvel person and have no idea what Ant-Man is or haven’t yet seen the movie, I suggest you watch the trailer


In The Trailer, Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) and Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) have a chat about “breaking into places and stealing stuff”, but in the movie they say “breaking into places and stealing sh*t”.


Honestly, I rate Ant-Man a 5/5 Movie for the following reasons. I first think that Ant-Man has great potential for the future, as at the end of the movie he was announced to become an Avenger, so we can expect to see Scott back on the big screen. But that isn’t really a great reason to like the original movie. I do also like the silly humor. Example, look at this exclusive clip from the movie:

Hilarious, I know

Another reason i really liked the movie was because of the action and thrills you experience. Shure, other movies can be like that too, but theirs nothing like seeing a man get slapped from what seems like the likes of Invisible Boy, or a battle on a child’s toys, etc.

I really do recommend Ant-Man to anyone who wants a new, fresh thriller with a splash of humor.

Oh yeah, and Baskin Robinns always finds out.

Jurassic World: The Scientific Inacuracies

So, Jurassic World… where to begin. It was a great movie, I watched it 3 times already. Even with all the cash the dino movie farmed, people who really know dinosaurs (like paleontologists, and other dino fans), found that some of the animated dinos had some scientific errors. let’s go through the 3 dinosaurs That I found most scientifically incorrect in one way or another.

# 3
The Pterosaurs
It was believed that Pterosaurs had fur to keep warm in their trips through the sky. However, the Pterosaurs in jurassic park lacked this feature. The main reason they probably didn’t have the fur is because… well, what’s more scary and amusing, a flying reptile covered with fur, or a flying reptile without fur? Also, in the movie trailer, the Pterosaurs pick up people, which wouldn’t happen because it would make the pterosaur too heavy.



# 2
The Mosasaur
The mosasaur in jurassic world has a couple of body problems. The Mosasaur is oversized, here is a size chart.

JW Mosasaur

The chart explains it all.
The mosasaur also had very smooth skin in reality, but the movie thinks otherwise…

Mosasaur GIF

# 1
The Velociraptor
The Velociraptors in Jurassic world lack one thing that many paleontologist agree that they had, FEATHERS!!!!


The reason most likely responsible for this is the same as the pterosaurs, the velociraptors wouldn’t look as cool if they had feathers, they would look more like shorter, leaner ostriches with a tail than anything else. But the reason the Raptors are at the #1 spot is because they were such a big part of the movie.

Even with these scientific inaccuracies and many more, jurassic world does open up our view just a little bit more to what dinosaurs were like, 65 million years ago.